Recipe for a perfect game...

Found in a paper of Anatol RAPOPORT (Scientific American, July 1967) who tells the following joke which he found in 'The Complete Strategist' by J. D. Williams:
"Two policemen are considering the problem of catching the bandit. One of them starts to calculate the optimal mixed strategy for the chase. The other policeman protests.
'While we're doodling,' he points out, 'he is making his getaway.'
'Relax,' says the game-theorist policeman. 'He's got to figure it out too, don't he?'

In order to use a recipe for a perfect game you need a lot of almost impossible to get ingredients. Anyway, you take George Arthur Akerlof, Joseph Stiglitz and Michael Spence, put them in bundler and mix for a 10 years. Be careful, cause 10 year means tens years. It does not mean 10 years and 1 day. In case if you wait more than 10 years, you have to start again, because your game would be full of uncertainty, even you would be uncertain about the uncertainty of your "perfect game model". Than, you have to add Von Neumann and John Nash, but don´t put them at the same time, because such way there would be no model and no perfect game. Both Neumann and John Nash are the most inteligent players in the world. Ok. It seems that you have everything.

Now you have the “perfect game model”.

Enjoy…

Tip: George Arthur Akerlof could be found at the University of California; Joseph Stiglitz at Columbia faculty or some where in developing countries.

This article in no way determines to destruct the fame of the economy or any economists/mathematicians/persons here mentioned. In spite I would like here to show the world that economics is fun or could be fun, it depends how you put it. (By the way, there are two ways to put the economics: one is upside and another is upside down. However, it does not make any difference)